0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¸ðÀ¯¼öÀ¯Áö½Ä ¹× ŵµ¿Í ¼öÀ¯½Ã ¸ð¾Æ »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ë

Knowledge and Attitude on Breast feeding and Mother-Infant Interaction during Feeding

°£È£¿Í Çõ½Å 2001³â 5±Ç 1È£ p.91 ~ 106
KMID : 0928020010050010091
Á¤Ãá¹Ì
±è¹Ì¿¹

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the level of knowledge and the level of attitude on breast feeding, and the level of mother-infant interaction during feeding. Furthermore to identify the correlation between each level of knowledge and attitude on breast feeding and the level of mother-infant interaction.
The subjects of this study were 125 mothers who have their infants in 6?4weeks after birth.
The data were collected from August, 6 to October, 15, 1999 using three questionnaires which were revised and made up for by referring to the content about mother-infant interaction, and the knowledge and attitude on breast feeding.
The data were analyzed by using SAS program with frequency, percentage, mean, t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson Correlation Coefficient.
The results of this study were as follows:
1. The mean score of the knowledge and attitude on breast feeding was 22.7/29 and 8.54/11.
2. The mean score of mother-infant interaction during feeding was 141.81/200 and it was moderate. Out of the maternal behavior S3items, the scores of l6items were higher than average score. The highest score was 3.21 and the item was ¡°mother touches her infant softly¡± Out of the infant behavior l7items, the scores of 8items were higher than average score. The highest score was 3.07 and the item was infant sees mother¡¯s eye once more
3. There was no significant correlation between the knowledge and attitude on breast feeding and mother-infant interaction during feeding(r=0.02, P=0.80; r=0.10, P=0.26).
4. Mother-infant interaction was significantly related to infant¡¯s age(F=4.04 P=0.020l) and infant¡¯s birth order(t= 2.09, P=0.0384)
In conclusion, this study identified no relationship between the knowledge and attitude on breast feeding and mother-infant interaction. Therefore it is recommended that more study is needed to examine the instrument which were used in this study.
KeyWords
¸ðÀ¯¼öÀ¯Áö½Ä, ¸ðÀ¯¼öÀ¯Åµµ, ¸ð¾Æ»óÈ£ÀÛ¿ë
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)